Part One: The Barbara Streisand Effect

In the event that you havent explored the California Coastal Records Project (resource), you need to. The web site hosts nearly half of a terabyte of images, approximately 100,000 in every, such as, obviously, the California coast, and spans a lot of the Oregon and Mexico borders aswell. Some areas are omitted for national security reasons, for instance Vandenberg AFB, however, a lot of the states coastline is roofed in the projects database. Beyond beautiful coastlines, the database also houses, and makes publicly available, images of properties overlooking the Pacific Ocean; including Malibu estates, to the chagrin of some celebrity and high-profile residents.

In early 2003, Barbara Streisand sued Kenneth Adelman along with the now-defunct, for what the lawsuit alleged was, at that time, an invasion of privacy. Before the lawsuit, which sought to eliminate the residences images from the database (and all public record information for example), the estate of Barbara Streisand, in accordance with legal records, have been viewed (downloaded) a complete of six times from the web site that’s not a misprint, literally six times. Just how many times would you reckon that the images were viewed or downloaded following the lawsuit made front-page news?

Within a month of the case becoming national news, the images were downloaded over 420,000 times (which was through the early internet era), the precise opposite of what Streisand and her legal team had intended. The news headlines eventually went global and significantly less than 10 months following the original lawsuit was filed, a LA Superior Court judge dismissed the case, however, the irony of the case still resonates today because of unintended consequences.

Nearly 2 decades later, in many areas of research, The Streisand Effect continues to be a prominent topic of discussion and folks continue steadily to view images of the house again, the opposite of the initial objective. Attempted censorship drew attention. Streisands attempt at suppressing information was and is still a catastrophic disaster. Broad fields beyond the most obvious (journalism, pr or communications) such as for example politics and business continually add types of failed censorship events; a lot of that have backfired against a business or individual wanting to suppress a concept, concept, topic, event or innovation. Local, national and international examples enhance the growing field and rekindle this issue (source).

Within an article from 2015 by Sue Curry Jansen (USA) and Brian Martin (Australia) titled The Streisand Effect and Censorship Backfire (source) the authors identified five tactics utilized by censors so that they can reduce outrage. Again, in most cases they typically backfire, particularly when the audience knows the manipulation attempt(s). These tactics, as cited in Jansen and Martins work are:

  1. Hiding the existence of censorship;
  2. Devaluing targets (the individuals or groups) of censorship;
  3. Reinterpreting actions by lying, minimizing consequences, blaming others and using benign framing;
  4. Using official channels to provide an appearance of justice; and
  5. Intimidating opponents.

Been there as well right? There are several people (truckers, supporters, citizens and free thinkers) who continue steadily to work in defiance of the Canadian Prime Ministers directive, which may be the next exemplory case of the Streisand Effect playing out now. The irony of combining liberals and conservatives is profound for so multiple reasons, way too many to list here nevertheless, you obtain the idea. These events had Canadians from all walks of life seeking refuge out of these country and their legacy bank operating system; plus they have non-Canadians questioning if theyll ever set foot in the united kingdom later on. The five bullet-points above are playing out in lock-step, however, the best society now sees beyond the censorship, targeting and intimidation tactics, and theyre embracing Bitcoin. Canada, Id prefer to expose you to Barbara Stresiand; she’s a story to inform you.

Part Two: Push-Pull Factors

Generally in most Geography 101 classes, students are introduced to Push-Pull Factors. You can find demographic, economic, political, ecological and migrant flow sub-categories and the Venn diagram begins to obtain a bit muddled the more one digs in to the details. For the purposes of the explanation, lets break them into two categories, natural and human-made. In the easiest sense, push factors repel people, and therefore make living difficult, uncomfortable, unbearable or impossible to keep in a particular location. Push factors literally push inhabitants out of a particular region or locale. That’s where Elon Musk leaving California for Texas is practical; and just why a once proud Canadian is currently on Zillow exploring property options in the usa.

Natural push factors might include, but aren’t limited by: erupting volcanoes, flooding, earthquakes and habitually bad weather. Conversely, human-made push factors might include, but aren’t limited by: taxation, violence, crime, insufficient adequate healthcare, poor local economy, excessive bureaucracy (red tape), martial law or perhaps a insufficient opportunity or prosperity for residents.

Pull factors take a seat on the contrary end of the spectrum: These attributes pull (attract) visitors to them. Elon Musk was pushed out of California but he was also pulled into Texas. These factors can, more often than not, function as inverse of push factors. Pleasant weather and abundant natural resources are types of natural pull factors; additionally, upheld freedoms, low taxes, low crime, good schools, exceptional healthcare, expedited or limited processing of permits and abundant occupations are types of human-made pull factors.

The push-pull factors could possibly be visualized in many ways, but most obviously has been moving trucks or caravans of individuals migrating to a fresh destination hoping of abandoning one which is less desirable.

Just what exactly on the planet do Barbara Streisand or push-pull factors want to do with the Bitcoin community or those Canadians fighting for his or her economic lives? Whether world leaders acknowledge these factors exist or not does not have any impact on the truth that a push-pull crypto and residential war was accessible. Manipulation tactics of days gone by only illuminate censorship agendas and drive a lot more people to distrust the federal government, explore bitcoin ownership and subsequently, cold storage for the asset; again, the precise opposite of the intended objective.

In the U.S., states with an over-all knowledge of these factors will work to incentivize (pull) crypto talent (coders, businesses and beyond) with their cities and states; paradoxically, some states usually do not even realize theyre in a battle because they push talent away.

The complete country of Canada, with the stroke of a pen, became a worldwide push factor for most residents and a push-factor country for future Bitcoin retirees. The U.S. authorities hasnt gone that far, however they may, and when they do, theyll have their very own states perspectives and opposition to cope with. An Executive Order, historically, has already established a means of either righting the ship or shitting the bed; well observe how this plays out, but Im cautiously optimistic.

Wyoming, for instance, has aspirations of housing 5% of the global Bitcoin hashrate by another halvening; create a note to find an excellent article by Amanda Cavaleri on Bitcoin Magazines website (source) for more on that. Wyoming sees itself in a war for migrants fleeing neighboring states; couldnt the U.S. do exactly the same for neighboring countries?

As Bitcoin exits the infancy phase and matures, U.S. states positioned with freedom at the forefront, supported by naturally abundant energy and/or favorable tax incentives (Wyoming, Texas and Nevada are clear, but New Mexico, Utah and Colorado aren’t to be overlooked of the conversation) are literally pulling (attracting) cryptographers, coders, miners, crypto businesses and entrepreneurs with their states and today, possibly pro-Bitcoin and no-coiner Canadians aswell.

This is along with entrepreneurs who’ve noticed this shift and so are forward-thinking. Planning of housing developments, restaurants and the mandatory infrastructure essential to retain new inhabitants already are in the works. These states may also be attracting Canadians who seek asylum from the existing developments within their own country. U.S. politicians, please give consideration. You have a chance to attract not merely the brightest minds of the generation, but also several individuals who are hardworking, decent and searching for opportunity.

To keep and retain people and businesses, states (and countries) will have to continue steadily to incentivize residents never to only stay, but to flourish, expand and hopefully retire within their states (and country for example). What incentives do some Canadians have for residing in their very own country now?

Incentives might include tax law, made to attract (pull) new residents low or zero percent taxes on income, low relative sales taxes and/or low or non-existent capital gains taxes at hawaii level. For a few Canadians, a push factor might imply that they have their house taken because of the personal beliefs, without due process. Many regular Ukrainians and Russians may also be exploring choices for relocation. These moments will define countries offering opportunities for folks in need; Opportunity ought to be apolitical.


At the very least, a country or declare that is agnostic in how a person spends their time or currency (as long as they’re not infringing upon others freedoms, needless to say) is really a start. Moreover, an area where individual freedoms are upheld, even though political leadership disagrees, is really a foundational aspect of america these attributes have the potential to draw the best talent, wealth migration and geopolitical shift the planet has ever seen. I genuinely believe the U.S. could end up being the global leader in the digital asset space; politicians have to provide breathing room for innovation.

The ball is in the American court at this time, whether they elect to embrace the Founding Fathers original intentions of Life, Liberty and the Quest for Happiness or side with the Canadian directive. There exists a massive possibility to open the countrys arms to people seeking freedoms unavailable within their current region(s).

Remember that Canada has opposition and that their Prime Minister will not speak for several its citizens. Nor do I; Im only a free voice (for the present time) in the U.S., with one perspective. Same for Russian citizens; we can not assume that all folks from every area think alike and therefore, a country open and ready to allow differing perspectives provides freedoms only dreamt of in other areas of the planet.

Currently, Malta, Portugal and Puerto Rico are destinations the crypto-wealthy are migrating to in attempts to lessen or eliminate their tax burden because they spend or exchange their crypto assets for fiat currencies. Canadians, take notice here when trying to find a new home in regards to financial flexibility, but youll also need to consider exploring nations with an effective Constitution, a Bill of Rights or equivalent.

A few of you might have had your wealth seized, however your talents can’t be taken those gifts, work ethic and knowledge opt for you, wherever you go.

Later on, Bitcoin offers you a chance to avoid these wealth-transferring events and invite you to make sure your prosperity outside censorable financial systems.

A few of your peers could have already made this decision. So involve some states and countries seeking your attention. Puerto Rico, for instance, currently includes a 0% capital gains tax and a 4% tax rate on residents (assuming anyone really wants to sell their bitcoin). However your personal freedoms are in stake aswell: Ensure those areas of life are considered in the event that you relocate.

What’s to avoid future Texas, Nevada or Wyoming crypto retirees from leaving their respective states hoping of lowering their tax burden within their final years of life? In reality, nothing; these crypto-entrepreneurial states may belong to exactly the same complacent trap California, NY and today Canada have time will tell should they study from the mistakes of these before them. Note: crypto-friendly countries/regions, in a concealed war for talent with Malta and Portugal, include: Switzerland, Slovenia, Singapore, Malaysia, El Salvador, Hong Kong, Germany and Belarus.

Future Canadian refugees (yes, I called them refugees) are taking notes because they plan their exit. The physical Ukrainian and Russian distance from the shores of the U.S. creates a hard trek and therefore, neighboring countries, for a while, get the chance that the U.S. has pertaining to Canada: Only some are sufficiently well off to produce a journey halfway all over the world.

So, should they do arrive, what states will new immigrants call home? And can they stay, flourish and/or retire there later on?

Wyoming, Texas, Nevada along with other American states will face exactly the same hardships (i.e. mass outward migration) that NY and California face today (and something Canada will face soon) if they’re not careful. Likewise, each crypto-friendly state can not only have to have abundant energy sources, a reliable and talented workforce, a thriving and supportive infrastructure, each state should have the ability to compete for the economic spending of retirees.

What good to hawaii tax board is really a millionaire or billionaire in California should they migrate to a competing state making use of their retirement portfolios and check out patronize businesses, purchase homes, vehicles, etc., outside the state where income or investments were earned or matured? Likewise, what good is really a Russian millionaire if their rubles are worthless? Russians lost due to overnight inflation; Canadians lost to government theft.

In Canada, funds were literally seized, however, those assets are just a snapshot into the future potential of the people. All Canada did was ensure an eternity of distrust from not merely their very own people, but future potential citizens who’ve removed Canada as another spot to call home, create a business and/or retire in. In Russia, bank runs are a growing possibility.

You can find rumblings that folks have canceled Canadian vacation trips in line with the actions of an individual. What economic toll will censorship have on a country; and what economic opportunity exists for a country ready to allow its citizens true economic freedom?

Canada is on the right track to lose the center of its economy should they continue steadily to demonize their workforce. Similarly, California is on a track to determining just what a 10% (or even more) tax on zero (i.e. never having realized gains in hawaii) is, and when that policy was worth losing to circumstances or location with a 4% tax remember, these regions are competing for potentially millions, billions or trillions (if inflation keeps up) of dollars of future realized income. While Canada and California will vary, they are also a whole lot alike within their political pursuits and resulting human exodus.

California and NY are prime types of legacy states that benefited from the tech boom (California) and a digitized analog financial boom (NY), but havent adapted to a changing climate of remote workers or digital assets. These states may also be those that stand to lose probably the most economic, political and cultural influence of another generation.

Canada is in an identical boat. The push-pull wars between regions such as for example California and Texas, NY and Florida, or Canada and the united states, go well beyond current political party preference. The news of Liberal versus Conservative make easy clickbait for ad revenue; however, the discourse is a lot more complex than comes in a small number of characters. The same applies to your choice many Canadians will face when contemplating to abandon their house for promised freedoms which will be honored elsewhere.

These migration wars, once won, will exceed shaping the economic landscape of america, Canada or the planet; victorious states (or countries) provides another generation of thought leaders in a number of political arenas and economic forums.

Regions (or countries) which successfully attract and retain pro-crypto (freedom) individuals and businesses will directly influence cultural trends for many years to come. California, using its large number of tax laws and impediments to entrepreneurs, stands to reduce more than only a couple of millionaires or billionaires in the fight; California has recently begun to reduce television and film to competing states, what’s next?

I posit that hawaii is on the brink of losing its political and cultural influence on the united states and the planet. Some may welcome this change, others might not. Given the decision, I dont believe the U.S. government wish to relinquish its dominance in global leadership; embracing digital assets may be the most likely direction. Even though Im sure Centralized Digital Dollars are just a couple of years out, Bitcoins dominance will never be undone through centralized projects.

Canada has recently done enough damage that the consequences can last generations; the distrust will never be forgotten and the Streisand Aftereffect of financial seizure only ensures more citizens will seek refuge outside traditional channels. Their failure is really a global opportunity. Similarly, people seeking refuge from Ukraine and Russia want opportunity, freedom and security; just what Bitcoin proponents suggest the protocol offers.

Part Three: Canada, Streisand And Bitcoin

The events which were unfolding in Canada last month certainly are a testament to the fragility of freedom; this month, Ukranians and Russians come in the same boat. I possibly could postulate here, dissect each event, propose solutions, correlate other countries and remind readers of the annals around mass manipulation through the entire pages of history, but I wont; ultimately, it doesnt matter. Whats the phrase? Something such as, its simpler to manipulate someone than make sure they are realize theyve been manipulated

So instead Ill pose a question, something youll need to answer on your own. What can you seek nowadays?

Odds are, the solution revolves around freedom in a few fashion. In the lawsuit Streisand filed in 2003, freedom won. Canada wanting to censor regular people will most likely backfire for a variety of reasons; the conflict between Ukraine and Russia could have a similar outcome the contrary of that which was intended if we are able to fast-forward history.

Dictators, while often victorious for a while, are despised by their people, even many within their own inner circles; typically its only a matter of time.

AMERICA has an possibility to become a refuge for folks from all over the world, not only their neighbors to the north, seeking a free of charge society and a free of charge economy. A welcoming country may potentially gain appreciative, hardworking, kind and intelligent those who are willing and potentially in a position to bring a net positive gain to a society, because they work to flee chaos.

Moreover, the financial missteps of previous governments includes a growing amount of people cautious with fiat currencies and therefore, a country available to its inhabitants owning Bitcoin will be a positive for that country.

Be skeptical of politicians who say otherwise in regards to Bitcoin. Odds are they will have a financial incentive for censorship.

If america were a lighthouse, Id suggest it had been time and energy to actually illuminate the light and remind the planet of which kind of a country they are actually. You can find ships at sea searching for a home; focus on see if the American lighthouse turns on or stays at night.

It is a guest post by Dr. Riste Simnjanovski. Opinions expressed are entirely their very own , nor necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.

Read More


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.